Public Access Survey for 2023 & 2024 MIPS Quality ID #219 : Functional Status Change for Patients with Foot & Ankle Impairments
Steps to use the Public Access Survey to report Quality ID 219 for MIPS:
- It is required that you read and ensure your understanding of the measure specification for this quality measure. To download the measure specification, visit the CMS Quality Payment Program website: https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/explore-measures/quality-measures. Search under the Clinical Quality Measure Specifications. CMS requires MIPS measure specifications to be housed on the CMS Quality Payment Program website.
- Hint: make sure you understand how to calculate the Risk-Adjusted Functional Status Change Residual Score by following the steps described under Numerator/Definitions.
- Once you understand all details of the measure specifications, access the Public Access Survey below for your patients to take the survey at the time of Initial Evaluation, Progress Evaluations, and Discharge during the relevant episode of care.
- Each time your patient completes the survey, be sure to record the date of survey completion, the Current Functional Status score, and the Predicted Improvement (Change) Score. This will allow you to calculate the Risk-Adjusted Functional Status Change Residual Score as described in the Numerator of the measure specification.
About the Public Access Survey
This Public Access Survey provides computer adaptive test (CAT) administration of the patient-reported outcome measure and standardized patient questions toward risk adjustment specified in the measure specification. Scoring results are provided on the last screen of the assessment.
The questions in the measure are to be answered independently by the patient, without coaching or other influence by the provider. Users are expected to be familiar with and adhere to the FOTO Standards of Administration provided HERE.
The Public Access Survey is available free of charge for non-commercial uses in the context of individual clinical practice, i.e., patient-level measurement, including but not limited to the purposes of participation in CMS Quality Payment Programs such as MIPS. For any commercial or other type uses, such as incorporation of the measure components into a product or service, Contact FOTO to determine whether a license agreement may be required.
Once you have read and understood the FOTO Standards of Administration, you may access the Public Access Survey to Support Quality ID 219. Upon accessing the survey, you must read and agree to the terms of the Limited License provided on page 1.
To access the Public Access Survey, you will need to read, understand, and agree to the FOTO Standards of Administration and the Terms and Conditions.
Public Access Survey to Support Quality ID 219 (recommended)
For best user experience, select Public Access Survey to Support Quality ID 219 (recommended) here. This recommended option provides patients with a shorter survey experience, using the FOTO Lower Extremity Physical Function (LEPF) CAT (computer adaptive test), and reduced clinician/staff burden with automated score and risk adjusted predicted change score provided on the last page of the survey.
This recommended approach aligns with CMS initiatives toward innovation and leveraging modern science and technology to improve meaningfulness and reduce burden for providers and patients while strengthening data integrity for CMS.
Alternative PROM option
This option allows you to administer the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) to your patient instead of the FOTO LEPF CAT. Using this survey option, the LEFS may be used to fulfill the PROM component of this quality measure. Even though the LEFS and FOTO LEPF are different PROMs with different scoring metrics, cross-walked scoring functionality allows clinicians the option to administer the LEFS to their patients for use in routine clinical care while reporting this quality measure (ID 219) for MIPS.
Analytic testing results confirmed the accuracy (reliability) and validity of the cross-walking methods and no statistically significant differences in “measure achievement points” as defined by CMS and used in CMS benchmarking deciles for MIPS Quality Benchmarks.
Access the Public Access Survey to Support Quality ID 219 with the LEFS as the alternative PROM and with all crosswalk functionality automated here.
Manual Administration, Scoring, and Calculating Option (not recommended)
This option is not recommended because of increased provider and patient burden and risk for error in hand-scoring and calculation steps.
Modal Title
Statistically equivalent score-linking between an IRT-based PROM and a suitable legacy PROM is produced using advanced psychometric methods. The approach results in a cross-walk table that facilitates the conversion of a legacy PROM score to the metric of the IRT-based PROM. Once a legacy score is cross-walked to its equivalent IRT-based PROM score, the corresponding risk adjustment model for the CQM can be applied and the risk-adjusted predicted change score calculated, followed by the calculation of patient-level residual scores (i.e., observed change minus predicted change) from which the “performance met” criterion is applied (residual >=0). Depending on the measurement characteristics of the legacy PROM, an adjustment factor may be applied to the crosswalk-based residuals to balance the rates of performance met to those of the IRT-based PROM.
For access to the PROM short form and scoring table select here. To gain access to applicable crosswalk functionality or risk adjustment coefficients email your request to FOTO
References
1. Albano AD, Rodriguez MC. Statistical equating with measures of oral reading fluency. J of Sch Psych 50 (2012) 43–59.
2. Albano AD. R Package ‘equate’ (Version 2.0-3): Observed-Score Linking and Equating. October 21, 2014.
3. Albano AD. equate: An R Package for Observed-Score Linking and Equating. October 21, 2014.
4. PROsetta Stone Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. https://www.prosettastone.org/. Accessed January 15, 2022.