The scramble for innovative approaches to care is real. Payment based on delivering results is happening. Are there ways to maintain quality while reducing costs?

At times it seems we play the game, “how low will you go?” I’m referring to “can more be done for patients in less visits?” The traditional frequency of three times a week for service delivery has been phased out for the majority of our patients. Typically patients may be seen 1-2 times/week.

When I see research comparing 5 sessions to 12 sessions, I begin to get a little bit curious. Reducing in office visits by over half will have a huge impact on cost for the episode of care IF results are truly delivered.

I found a video that helped explain eExercise and how technology was used in the provision of services. I’m not sure that this is the best solution for all patients – yet it seems there are some pearls as to which types of patients this type of model may be appropriate within the article.

Hopefully this study is somewhat helpful as you think of the cost of your services, your outcomes and ways to deliver services more cost effectively.

You’ll find the abstract to the recent study below.

Effectiveness of a Blended Physical Therapist Intervention in People With Hip Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, or Both: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kloek CJJ¹, Bossen D², Spreeuwenberg PM³, Dekker J⁴, de Bakker DH⁵, Veenhof C⁶.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Integrating physical therapy sessions and an online application (e-Exercise) might support people with hip osteoarthritis (OA), knee OA, or both (hip/knee OA) in taking an active role in the management of their chronic condition and may reduce the number of physical therapy sessions.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term effectiveness of e-Exercise compared to usual physical therapy in people with hip/knee OA.

DESIGN:

The design was a prospective, single-blind, multicenter, superiority, cluster- randomized controlled trial.

SETTING:

The setting included 143 primary care physical therapist practices.

PARTICIPANTS:

The participants were 208 people who had hip/knee OA and were 40 to 80 years of age.

INTERVENTION:

e-Exercise is a 3-month intervention in which about 5 face-to-face physical therapy sessions were integrated with an online application consisting of graded activity, exercise, and information modules. Usual physical therapy was conducted according to the Dutch physical therapy guidelines on hip and knee OA.

MEASUREMENTS:

Primary outcomes, measured at baseline after 3 and 12 months, were physical functioning and free-living physical activity. Secondary outcome measures were pain, tiredness, quality of life, self-efficacy, and the number of physical therapy sessions.

RESULTS:

The e-Exercise group (n = 109) received, on average, 5 face-to-face sessions; the usual physical therapy group (n = 99) received 12. No significant differences in primary outcomes between the e-Exercise group and the usual physical therapy group were found. Within-group analyses for both groups showed a significant improvement in physical functioning. After 3 months, participants in the e-Exercise group reported an increase in physical activity; however, no objectively measured differences in physical activity were found. With respect to secondary outcomes, after 12 months, sedentary behavior significantly increased in the e-Exercise group compared with the usual physical therapy group. In both groups, there were significant improvements for pain, tiredness, quality of life, and self-efficacy.

LIMITATIONS:

The response rate at 12 months was 65%.

Phys Ther. 2018 Jul 1;98(7):560-570. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy045.